
Taking a bird's eye view of EU wood-based policy: Untangling policy, institutional, and actor frameworks affecting the wood-based sectors
Authored by: Filip Aggestam, Gerhard Weiss, Jerbelle Elomina, Helga Pülzl
Executive Summary
The wood-based sector – comprising industries that rely primarily on wood and wood-based products such as roundwood, sawnwood, pulpwood, plywood, veneers, wood chips and pulp – is receiving increasing attention from national, European and international policymakers.
Wood offers numerous benefits: it is a renewable, organic material that sequesters carbon throughout its life cycle, substitutes for fossil-based materials such as steel, plastic and concrete, and supports the transition to a circular bioeconomy. However, balancing its industrial use with the protection of forests and their ecosystem services – such as biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration – presents policy challenges and trade-offs.
The wood-based sector operates in a highly diverse policy landscape, spanning multiple industries, stakeholders, and interests. The fragmented and diverse EU policy environment compounds this complexity. Unlike other sectors governed by a single policy, there is no EU-wide policy for wood. Instead, wood-related policymaking follows the principle of subsidiarity, with EU Member States (MS) having the primary responsibility for policymaking. The only exceptions to this rule are certain non-timber forest products, such as cork and certain forest-based fruits. This lack of direct EU competence results in a complex web of regulatory, strategic and financial policy instruments that directly and indirectly influence the sector. Some policy instruments can incentivise or restrict forest-based wood production, while others shape the regulatory landscape for wood-dependent industries.
The picture is further complicated by the diversity of wood value chains, spanning sectors such as construction, furniture, energy, paper, plastics and textiles. Policy instruments can have different impacts depending on where companies operate within the supply and value chains. For example, a sawmill faces different regulatory challenges than a furniture manufacturer, while bioplastics producers are subject to various environmental and product safety regulations as compared to paper mills.
Clarifying the links between different EU policy instruments that affect the wood-based sector is essential to address this complexity. This requires a comprehensive understanding of how broader environmental, climate, socioeconomic, and industrial priorities intersect with the perspectives of institutions, policymakers, and stakeholders.
Objectives of this study
- Map the EU policy and institutional framework and identify
the key actors and mechanisms shaping wood-based policy. - Provide a detailed overview of the regulatory landscape
affecting the EU construction sector. - Explore ways to improve policymaking processes that
support the sustainable use of wood while balancing
competing policy objectives.
Key Challenges
Fragmented policy instruments and overlapping
regulations:
- The lack of a unified EU wood policy means that sector
regulations come from several, often uncoordinated, policy
areas. - The EU Forestry Strategy does not fully consider the
wide range of regulatory frameworks affecting the woodbased
industries, leaving gaps in areas such as industrial
emissions, product safety, energy policy and transport
regulations. - Different industries within the wood-based sector are
affected in various ways. For example, wood construction
companies must navigate energy efficiency regulations
and circular economy initiatives, while wood-based textile
manufacturers face evolving standards for bio-based
materials and chemical restrictions.
Trade-offs between sustainability and industrial growth
- Biodiversity-friendly afforestation policies promote
ecological conservation but can limit the availability of
commercially viable timber, impacting supply chains. - The role of wood as a carbon sink versus its use as a fossil
fuel substitute remains an unresolved policy debate. While
storing carbon in forests is consistent with climate goals,
harvested wood products (HWPs) can store carbon for
decades in buildings, furniture, and bio-based materials, yet
they are often overlooked in climate accounting. - Bioeconomy innovations such as wood-based textiles and
bioplastics require stable wood supply chains, but restrictive
policies can discourage investment
Key Recommendations
Improve policy coherence through cross-sectoral coordination
- Establish inclusive governance
mechanisms to align forest, trade, industrial and environmental policies. - Develop a common definition of
‘wood-based policy’ at the EU level ensuring that policymaking reflects the range of wood-dependent industries and value chains.
Recognise the role of wood in reducing fossil fuel dependency
- Integrate the carbon storage potential of harvested wood products (HWPs) into climate change policies.
- Strengthen policy frameworks that promote the sustainable use of harvested timber while ensuring responsible forest management.
Monitor and adjust policies based on measurable results
- Establish robust tracking systems and policy impact assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations and identify gaps.
- Introduce flexible mechanisms that allow policymakers to adopt
regulations in response to industry needs and sustainability challenges.
A call for a more integrated approach
Prioritise sustainable practices: Focus on producing carbon-neutral biomass, sustainable wood and non-wood products, and environmentally sound processing of these materials.
Align with broader EU objectives: Policies must support Sustainable Forest Management (SFM), nature conservation, improved air quality, energy efficiency, fair trade, and public health, aligning with the EU’s broader bioeconomy and circular economy goals.